As the CEO of Portainer, I’m often asked why we chose the path we did in a landscape where thousands of tools are vying for a place in the Kubernetes ecosystem. Survey after survey cites complexity as one of the main challenges to adopting Kubernetes, it's not that Kubernetes on its own is complex - it's the vast ecosystem and choices.. so let me explain a few things.
In my view, the CNCF ecosystem’s abundance of tools offers incredible flexibility, but for most companies it also introduces unnecessary complexity. Many tools overlap in functionality or demand such specialized knowledge that only large, resource-rich organizations can manage them effectively. For most companies, especially those starting their journey with containers, this level of choice and complexity isn’t just overwhelming, it’s counterproductive.
Our vision with Portainer has always been about cutting through this complexity. We recognized very early on that the majority of organizations don’t need an intricate assembly of specialized tools just to run their applications on Kubernetes or Docker. For these organizations, we saw an opportunity to provide everything needed to get started and operate effectively within a single platform. Portainer was designed, from day 1, to be that all-in-one solution, a tool that allows organizations to get up and running with containers without the heavy investment and complexity typically required.
Our focus is on practical simplicity. Portainer provides the core features needed to manage Kubernetes and Docker environments from start to finish. When companies deploy purchased software, Portainer can serve as their sole platform and deployment management tool. Even when companies develop their own applications, Portainer can cover nearly every operational need. A CI tool like GitHub Actions may be used for building container images and a container registry will house those images, but beyond that Portainer provides a complete set of tools to manage deployments, monitor performance, and secure the environment.
This is where Portainer’s true value lies: we take away the need for fragmented tools and interfaces, enabling companies to focus on their applications without worrying about mastering a myriad of technical components.
Of course, not all companies will remain at this foundational level forever, and we understand that as they scale, additional needs and complexities will arise. This is where Portainer’s flexibility comes into play. Our goal is to meet 70% of most companies’ needs out of the box, but we also make it easy for organizations to integrate more specialized tools as they grow.
When companies reach that stage, they might require:
Infrastructure Management (IaC) - For dynamic environments, tools like Ansible or Terraform might be added to automate the creation and scaling of clusters, while Portainer remains the management console.
Advanced CI/CD - For complex deployments, a company might choose to integrate ArgoCD or Flux, moving beyond Portainer’s built-in GitOps/CD features. In these cases, Portainer’s Kubernetes API proxy allows seamless integration.
Deep Observability - As the criticality of applications grows, so does the need for more granular monitoring. Some companies may deploy centralized instances of Prometheus and Grafana, for example, connecting through Portainer’s API proxy. Others might need centralized logging and may look to Splunk or the ELK stack for insights that go beyond the per-pod logging Portainer offers.
Security Enhancements - With increased workloads, organizations may need Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems, network introspection, or internal firewalling (network policies) within clusters. Portainer is built to allow these integrations as needed, though for many companies, our built-in capabilities like OPA Gatekeeper already cover essential security requirements.
What we’ve built at Portainer is a practical, powerful platform that empowers teams to begin their container journey with confidence and simplicity. This is not about locking companies into a restricted tool but rather giving them the freedom to expand when the time is right. By delivering a robust set of built-in capabilities that are designed to handle the majority of operational needs, and offering easy integration for advanced tools, Portainer strikes the balance between efficient container management and seamless growth potential.
For us, it’s about redefining what a container management platform should offer. In the end, we believe companies shouldn’t be forced to adopt unnecessary complexity until they’re ready. Portainer exists to take the stress out of Kubernetes so that organizations can focus on what matters: delivering their applications and scaling at their own pace.
What do you think? Am I successful in my endeavors to remove complexity and reduce operational overhead?
Neil